DV
Dividend Vision

Security Comparison

FSKAX vs VTI: Same Market, Different Wrapper

A head-to-head of Fidelity's Total Market Index Fund and Vanguard's total-market ETF covering trading, cost, and account fit.

Updated October 9, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • FSKAXInvestors who want broad equity exposure.
  • VTIInvestors who want the broadest one-fund diversification at rock-bottom cost.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

FSKAX has lagged VTI over the trailing twelve months, posting a 16.42% total return against 16.42%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: VTI has compounded at 14.96% a year, against 14.95% for FSKAX. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulative3Y annualized5Y annualized10Y annualizedSince Sep 2011Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
FSKAX14.57%16.42%22.84%12.63%14.95%14.88%15.5%1.091.58-19.4%
VTI14.54%16.42%22.79%12.57%14.96%14.89%15.4%1.051.53-19.3%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 9, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Sep 2011” measures every fund from September 14, 2011 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricFSKAXVTI
Full nameFidelity Total Market Index FundVanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
IssuerFidelity InvestmentsVanguard
Last Close$214.59 as of October 9, 2026$381.94 as of October 9, 2026
Distribution rate0.92%1.00%
Trailing 12-month yield0.91%1.03%
Distribution Safety Score™ 89100
Safety-Adjusted Yield 0.82%1.00%
Expense ratio0.015%0.03%
AUM$142B$696B
Distribution frequencySemi-AnnualQuarterly
Underlying index—Morningstar US Total Market Index
Objective—Seeks to track the Morningstar US Total Market Index.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date11/05/199705/24/2001
Beta1.031.0379
Last dividend$0.164$0.9555
Ex-dividend date04/10/202609/28/2026

Bottom lineChoose FSKAX if you want broad equity exposure. Choose VTI if you want the broadest one-fund diversification at rock-bottom cost.

FSKAX vs VTI: mutual fund or total-market ETF?

Same US total market. FSKAX is a Fidelity mutual fund. VTI is a Vanguard ETF. Wrapper and cost are the decision.

FSKAXVTI
VehicleIndex mutual fundETF
TradingEnd-of-day net asset valueIntraday at a market price
Expense ratio0.015%0.03%

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each security at current yields.

ETFs116
Total AUM$4669B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Vanguard is one of the largest and most established ETF issuers, known for low-cost, broadly diversified fund offerings built on passive indexing principles. Their lineup spans multiple asset classes and strategies, including core equity and bond index funds, dividend-focused portfolios, ESG-screened options, factor-based strategies, sector exposure, target-date retirement funds, and international investments across developed and emerging markets. The platform is characterized by its emphasis on accessibility and cost efficiency across a comprehensive range of fund families, serving both individual investors seeking broad market exposure and those pursuing specific income, sustainability, or thematic objectives.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on VTI.

Want to go deeper?

Add these securities to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

FSKAX (Fidelity Total Market Index Fund) is a mutual fund, while VTI (Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF) is an ETF — their trading structures differ.

VTI offers the higher yield at 1.00% vs 0.92% for FSKAX. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

FSKAX is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.015% compared to 0.03%.

VTI is the larger fund by assets ($696B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, FSKAX would generate roughly $46.00 cash per distribution, while VTI would produce $25.00 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates.

FSKAX yield0.92%
VTI yield1.00%
Cash diff on $10K$21.00

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, FSKAX would cost approximately $15 in fees vs $30 for VTI (simplified, not compounded). The $15.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

FSKAX ER0.015%
VTI ER0.03%

Strategy & risk

VTI tracks Morningstar US Total Market Index. FSKAX is a mutual fund whose tracked index or strategy detail is not recorded in our data, so this comparison rests on the measured figures — yield, fees, size, and performance — rather than strategy labels. Beta is 1.03 for FSKAX and 1.0379 for VTI — effectively similar market sensitivity.

FSKAX beta1.03
VTI beta1.0379

Fund details

FSKAX is managed by Fidelity Investments (launched 11/05/1997) with $142B in assets. VTI is managed by Vanguard (launched 05/24/2001) with $696B in assets.

FSKAX AUM$142B
VTI AUM$696B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend investments.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between FSKAX and VTI?

Same US total-market idea, different wrapper. FSKAX (Fidelity Total Market Index Fund) is a Fidelity index mutual fund that transacts at end-of-day net asset value. VTI (Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF) is an ETF that trades all day. Cost is 0.015% versus 0.03%; distributions are 0.92% and 1.00% as of October 2026. FSKAX is a mutual fund, not an exchange-traded fund. Account fit and cost are the decision.

What is the current distribution rate for FSKAX and VTI?

FSKAX currently distributes 0.92% and VTI 1.00%, based on fund data updated October 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is FSKAX or VTI better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. VTI currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

Can I hold both FSKAX and VTI?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is FSKAX or VTI safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — VTI scores 100, FSKAX scores 89, so VTI's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, FSKAX or VTI?

FSKAX has an expense ratio of 0.015% while VTI charges 0.03%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in FSKAX vs VTI generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in FSKAX would generate roughly $46.00 cash per distribution ($92.00 annually). The same in VTI would produce about $25.00 cash per distribution ($100.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, FSKAX or VTI?

FSKAX has lagged VTI over the trailing twelve months, posting a 16.42% total return against 16.42%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: VTI has compounded at 14.96% a year, against 14.95% for FSKAX. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

FSKAX vs VTI — at a glance

Generated October 10, 2026.

Overview

FSKAX and VTI are both broad total U.S. stock market trackers that capture virtually identical underlying exposures—nearly all publicly traded American equities across market caps. Both aim to replicate the broad market with minimal fees, though they track slightly different indexes and distribute income on different schedules.

How they differ

The structural difference comes first. FSKAX settles once per day at the closing net asset value; VTI trades like a stock in real time, allowing intra-day entry and exit. FSKAX tracks the broader Fidelity Total Market Index while VTI targets the Morningstar US Total Market Index—the holdings are nearly identical, but index methodology and rebalancing can produce small tracking differences over time.

On fees, FSKAX's 0.015% expense ratio beats VTI's 0.03% by 0.01%—a gap that compounds into meaningful savings on a large balance over decades. Both carry essentially market-level beta (FSKAX 1.03, VTI 1.0379), so there's no performance drag from either fund's design.

Who each is best for

FSKAX: Fits buy-and-hold investors who prioritize the absolute lowest annual fee drag and can accept trading only once per day at the market close. The semi-annual distribution schedule suits those who prefer less frequent tax-lot decisions.

VTI: Fits investors who value real-time market access, may trade or rebalance frequently, and want the tightest bid-ask spreads that come with extremely high trading volume. The quarterly distribution cadence appeals to those managing reinvestment or monitoring income more often.

Key risks to know

  • Index-tracking drift: Although both funds track near-identical market segments, differences in index construction (Fidelity's versus Morningstar's methodology) and rebalancing timing can produce small performance gaps over multi-year periods. Neither fund guarantees perfect overlap with the other.
  • Single-factor equity concentration: Both funds concentrate on U.S. equities and include no international, fixed-income, or alternative assets. A sustained domestic equity bear market affects both equally.

Bottom line

If you prize the absolute lowest cost and can manage once-daily trading, FSKAX's 0.015% expense ratio offers a modest but persistent advantage over VTI's 0.03%. Over a 20-year horizon, the expense-ratio gap could save or cost thousands of dollars depending on account size—worth calculating for your specific situation. Past performance of either fund does not predict future market returns.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each security fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.