ETF Comparison

QQQ vs VTI: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Invesco QQQ Trust and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated May 20, 2026

Invesco

ETFs13

Total AUM$657.4B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Invesco is a major asset manager recognized for developing innovative ETF solutions across diverse investment strategies. Their fund lineup focuses primarily on income generation, offering investors options that emphasize dividend yield and regular distributions. With a portfolio of four ETFs including popular tickers like PRF (Preferred Stock ETF) and QQQM (Nasdaq-100 ETF), Invesco serves both income-focused and growth-oriented investors seeking streamlined exposure to specific market segments.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on QQQ.

See all Invesco ETFs

Vanguard

ETFs48

Total AUM$11763.3B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Vanguard is known for offering low-cost, passively managed ETFs that serve as core portfolio holdings for individual investors. Their fund lineup emphasizes core equity exposure and dividend income strategies, with offerings spanning domestic growth (VGT, VUG), broad market indices (VOO), dividend-focused portfolios (VYM, VIG), and international high dividend yield opportunities (VONG, VYMI). The issuer's seven funds are characterized by expense ratios among the industry's lowest and a focus on long-term, buy-and-hold investors seeking diversified equity exposure.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on VTI.

See all Vanguard ETFs

Side-by-side snapshot

	QQQ	VTI
Full name	Invesco QQQ Trust	Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Issuer	Invesco	Vanguard
Last Close	$705.88 as of May 20, 2026	$362.36 as of May 20, 2026
Distribution yield	0.40%	1.03%
Expense ratio	0.18%	0.03%
AUM	$440.3B	$2202.6B
Distribution frequency	Quarterly	Quarterly
Underlying index	Nasdaq-100 Index	CRSP US Total Market Index
Objective	Track the Nasdaq-100 Index, which includes 100 of the largest non-financial Nasdaq stocks.	Track the CRSP US Total Market Index, representing the broad U.S. equity market.
Asset class	Equity	Equity
Inception date	03/10/1999	05/24/2001
Beta	1.18	1.03
Last dividend	$0.73	$1.00
Ex-dividend date	03/23/2026	03/27/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Build a sample portfolio Forecast income

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Quick verdict

QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both quarterly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

VTI offers the higher yield at 1.03% vs 0.40% for QQQ. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

VTI is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.03% compared to 0.18%.

They track different benchmarks: QQQ is linked to Nasdaq-100 Index while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

VTI is the larger fund by assets ($2202.6B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, QQQ would generate roughly $3.33/month, while VTI would produce $8.58/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.

QQQ yield0.40%

VTI yield1.03%

Monthly diff on $10K$5.25

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, QQQ would cost approximately $180 in fees vs $30 for VTI (simplified, not compounded). The $150.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

QQQ ER0.18%

VTI ER0.03%

Strategy & risk

QQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index with a growth approach, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index using a basket strategy. Beta is 1.18 for QQQ and 1.03 for VTI, indicating VTI is less volatile relative to the market.

QQQ beta1.18

VTI beta1.03

Fund details

QQQ is managed by Invesco (launched 03/10/1999) with $440.3B in assets. VTI is managed by Vanguard (launched 05/24/2001) with $2202.6B in assets.

QQQ AUM$440.3B

VTI AUM$2202.6B

Ready to act?

Open in Comparator Model in portfolio See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Is QQQ or VTI better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. VTI currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between QQQ and VTI?

QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) tracks Nasdaq-100 Index with a growth strategy, while VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) tracks CRSP US Total Market Index with a basket approach. They are issued by Invesco and Vanguard respectively.

Can I hold both QQQ and VTI?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, QQQ or VTI?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VTI charges 0.03%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in QQQ vs VTI generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in QQQ would generate roughly $3.33 per month ($40.00 annually). The same in VTI would produce about $8.58 per month ($103.00 annually).

More comparisons to explore

People also compare QQQ with

People also compare VTI with

Popular comparisons

QQQ vs VTI — at a glance

Generated April 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

QQQ and VTI are both broad-market equity ETFs, but they track entirely different universes. QQQ holds the 100 largest non-financial stocks on the Nasdaq (tech-heavy, growth-focused), while VTI holds the entire U.S. stock market across all sectors and market caps. QQQ has nearly 5× the beta; VTI offers diversification across 3,500+ holdings.

How they differ

The biggest difference is scope. QQQ is a concentrated bet on large-cap Nasdaq stocks—roughly 50% of the fund sits in the top 10 holdings, all tech or tech-adjacent. VTI spreads capital across large-cap, mid-cap, and small-cap stocks in every sector, creating genuine broad-market exposure.

Second: yield. VTI pays 1.08% annually versus QQQ's 0.45%, reflecting the inclusion of dividend-paying industrials, financials, and utilities that Nasdaq-100 excludes. That said, QQQ's lower yield isn't a flaw—it's structural; growth stocks compound through capital gains, not dividends.

Third: cost and size. VTI charges 0.03% in fees (five times cheaper than QQQ's 0.18%) and manages nearly $2 trillion in AUM versus QQQ's $372 billion. Smaller fees compound over decades. QQQ's higher beta of 1.11 means it swings harder in both directions than the broader market (VTI's 1.04), so expect larger drawdowns in downturns.

Who each is best for

QQQ: Growth-focused investors with a 10+ year horizon who believe in tech and large-cap innovation; best in tax-advantaged accounts because the low dividend yield minimizes tax drag.

VTI: Buy-and-hold investors seeking maximum diversification across all U.S. sectors and market caps; appropriate for all account types due to tax efficiency and low fees; also suitable as a core holding for portfolios of any size or risk tolerance.

Key risks to know

Concentration risk (QQQ): A sharp pullback in the Nasdaq's mega-cap tech cluster—Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Tesla—directly hammers QQQ. VTI's 3,500+ holdings and sector diversity insulate it from single-sector drawdowns.

Sector cyclicality (QQQ): When growth underperforms value or when interest rates rise, QQQ historically lags broad-market returns. VTI's balanced sector exposure dampens this vulnerability.

Valuation risk (QQQ): The Nasdaq-100 commands premium multiples relative to the broader market. Mean reversion could pressure QQQ's returns relative to VTI over multi-year periods.

Beta amplification (QQQ): The 1.11 beta means a 10% market decline becomes roughly 11% for QQQ holders. Risk-averse investors may find this volatility uncomfortable.

Bottom line

If you believe large-cap tech will outperform and can tolerate higher volatility, QQQ offers purer exposure to that thesis with a 27-year track record. If you prefer lower fees, broader diversification, and steadier compounding across all market cycles, VTI's 0.03% expense ratio and total-market exposure make it the simpler, cheaper core holding. Past performance doesn't predict future results—but structural factors (fees, concentration, beta) are knowable today.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.